Fitbit vs Apple Watch: Which is Better?

Fitbit and Apple are the two biggest players in the smartwatch industry. So, the majority of consumers will pick either a Fitbit or an Apple Watch. But what’s the difference between these two brands?

Well, it has been said that Fitbits are primarily intended to be fitness trackers whilst Apple Watches are primarily intended to be personal assistants.

Whilst this might be half-true, I don’t think it’s a very helpful contrast to make, because both watches offer a range of features. Indeed, both watches can be considered hybrids, so I don’t think it’s fair to pigeonhole them as either a ‘smartwatch’ or a ‘fitness tracker’.

What are the differences between a Fitbit and an Apple Watch?

If you’re feeling confused, then don’t worry. In this article, I’ll show you how Fitbits compare with Apple Watches in terms of cost, battery life, fitness tracking, and extra features. So, let’s begin!

1. Heart rate tracking

Firstly, it should be said that both watches are very good at tracking heart rate (HR). Fitbit were actually the first company to offer continuous HR tracking on a wrist, so consider them trailblazers in this industry.

Nevertheless, Apple’s HR tracking technology is now superior. In fact, their sophisticated watches can detect the first signs of atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). Indeed, that’s why we should celebrate the Apple Watch as a health tracker (not just a smartwatch).

2. Activity and fitness tracking

Both watches perform highly in this category, though Fitbit may just have the edge. This is because some Fitbits offer on-screen workouts, and these are great for keeping you motivated.

Also, the Charge 3 is particularly good at detecting stairs climbed when compared to other watches like the Apple Watch.

Nevertheless, both watches offer automatic activity detection – which makes fitness tracking so much more convenient. As a result, either watch would make a great activity/fitness tracker.

3. Female health tracking

Fitbit have offered female health tracking since 2018, but Apple only joined the party this year (2019). Although they were late adding this feature, this press release from Apple suggests that the new technology holds huge potential for the future.

However, Apple aren’t elaborating on how the technology works, which suggests they may still be in the testing/tweaking stage. However, some people predict that Apple’s female health tracking technology is going to be far superior to the tech used by Fitbit and Garmin (which explains why we’ve had to wait so long for it).

So, if menstrual/female health tracking is important to you, investing in an Apple watch may be worth it. In fact, all Apple technology will have this feature, so you may even consider switching to an Apple handset.

4. Cost (and value for money)

You probably don’t need me to tell you that Apple watches are expensive! (Although there are places you can find cheap or used Apple watches). Bought new, the latest Apple Watch is more than 3 times the price of the Fitbit Charge 3. Also, its double the price of the Ionic, which is the most expensive Fitbit.

With Apple, you are partly paying for the brand. But, at the same time, the watch is packed full of features, so you are getting a lot for your money.

However, you won’t be getting value for money if you’re paying for features you don’t use. So, for some people, Fitbits do offer better value for money.

5. Battery life

When it comes to battery life, Fitbits are far superior (see table below). In fact, one of the biggest complaints about the Apple Watch is its battery life.

6. Style and design

One of the positive things about Fitbits is that they are lighter, thinner, and smaller than most other smartwatches (including the Apple Watch). As a result, this makes them ideal smartwatches for girls.

However, their futuristic design can make them unsuitable for some formal settings. If you want a Fitbit you can wear to any occasion, then consider the Fitbit Versa 2 or Fitbit Ionic.

7. Smart/tech features

When compared to Fitbits, Apple watches can be considered more hi-tech. For example:

• Both watches allow you to receive phone calls and texts, but the Apple Watch lets you reply to texts.
• In addition, the Apple Watch provides you with a personal assistant (SIRI). Unfortunately, Fitbits do not offer this feature.
• Also, there are 10,000+ apps available to download on Apple Watch. In contrast, Fitbit offers around 150+.
• Finally, you can live stream Apple Music on an Apple Watch, whereas you’ll have to download your music onto your Fitbit.

So, if you like having the most up-to-date technology, then the Apple Watch may be for you.

How does each Fitbit compare to the Apple Watch?

So, we’ve explored the main similarities and differences between Fitbit and Apple, but there is more than one type of Fitbit. In fact, they range in price from around £80 to £250. If you’re unsure how these all compare then read on. Below, I compare the four most popular Fitbits with the most recent Apple Watch 5.

Should I buy a Fitbit or Apple Watch?

So, this article has shown you the key differences between Fitbit and Apple watches.

Even with all this information, choosing between these brands can be difficult. Personally, I find the Fitbit Charge 3 or Versa 2 good options. For me, these watches are great ‘hybrids’, so they are certainly good value for money.

But I do think Apple’s technology is more impressive. Firstly, the Apple Watch has the power to detect an irregular heartbeat. Also, it seems that Apple’s female health tracking technology is going to superior to anybody else’s.

So, if these things sound exciting to you, and you have a healthy budget, the Apple Watch is unlikely to disappoint.

Still undecided? We have a helpful guide for choosing a smartwatch.

Last Updated on December 31, 2019